business laws in indian trade
2011
When the founding fathers anti-business according to the standard currently used by the Republicans / Conservatives?
They seem to imply that any bank regulation is anti-business or anti-capitalist. U.S. Constitution – Article 1, Section 8 The Congress shall have power … To regulate commerce with nations Foreign and among the few states and with Indian tribes. 1828 definitions: TRADE: In a general sense, a change or exchange reciprocal property, goods, productions, or property of any kind, between nations or individuals, either by barter or by buying and selling, trading, traffic. Trade is foreign or domestic. SET: To adjust the rule, method or manner in place, that, to regulate weights and measures; regulate d'Assise the bread, to solve our moral conduct by the laws of God and society, 2. To put in good order, as to regulate disorder state of a nation or its finances. 3. To subject to any rules or restrictions as to regulate commerce; 1828 The Webster's dictionary http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/search/word, trade
The argument being made by most people is that the Constitution does not specifically to enable the Congress to take charge of a corporation. A corporation is not a foreign nation, state or Indian tribe. In addition, Webster's dictionary does not affect the U.S. government at all.
Comment