Permanent Text

Apr 27
2010

Leave a
Comment

Permanent Text
In which of these methods differ from plantation agriculture Slash & Burn and permanent agricultural crops?

I can not find the answer to this question throughout my history text book. The choices are: a) cultures are maintained by the entire village b) cultures are harvested by traditional methods c) crops are moved to new land once the soil is worn d) cultures are profit rather helllllllp for personal use?

Well, think about it. Burning releases wooded / jungle area under crops and wood ash enriches the soil for several years. When the soil is worn, a new section is burned and left to return to the old wild. Traditionally this has been done in a food format, but crops are now done this way too. permanent crops is the modern method of farming where a field is fertilized and soil is managed to continue to produce crops year after year for generations. This has always been a combination of means of subsistence and commercial production, and left on crops, and some crops are marketed specifically grown for money and the objective of the firm is profit. plantation agriculture is a kind of mixture of both, if I understand things. The fields are rotated and production. Historically large quantities of crops have been grown that much work needed to hand and that manual labor was traditionally Cheap, innovation is not encouraged. Cultures were grown with intent to sell money. So I think I'd like to select the answer, but I'd be weak on this.